Northern Ag Network
Northern Ag Network
Northern Broadcasting System    Northern News Network    Northern Sports Network
Search This Site...
Search This Site...
How Low Can Wheat Go?

How Low Can Wheat Go?

10/6/2017 9:00:00 AM/Categories: General News, Today's Top 5, Grains, Wheat

ROCKVILLE, Md. (DTN) -- After several days of rainfall, Kansas wheat farmer Rick Horton was spending the morning in his truck, hunting for fields dry enough to drill wheat. The time was right, but the weather was not cooperating. 

In the 2016-17 crop year, farmers planted the smallest wheat crop in recorded U.S. history; now they are making decisions for the 2017-18 crop, and the market isn't promising. (DTN photo by Elaine Shein)

A nagging question hangs over Horton and other wheat farmers this fall: Should they bother?

"It's tough to keep gambling on planting corn-on-corn or milo-to-milo in western Kansas," said Horton, whose family farms and runs Horton Seed Services near Leoti, Kansas. "Wheat has always kind of been the safe bet. But recently, it isn't."

With wheat futures hovering in the mid-$4 range and cash prices closer to $3, wheat growers face a dilemma this fall. Wheat is unlikely to make a profit, but prices for corn, soybeans and sorghum -- the obvious alternatives -- are also depressed.

"It's kind of a dumpster fire right now, and the wheat one is burning the hottest," said David Widmar, an agricultural economist with a group called Agricultural Economic Insights, as well as a researcher with the Center for Commercial Agriculture at Purdue University. "The last few years have been a search for the least bad alternative."

Both Widmar and Horton agree that wheat acres are likely to slip again in the 2017-18 crop year. By how much and with what impact remain important questions.



From a simple yield perspective, corn, soybeans and sorghum have the potential to be more profitable alternatives than wheat. But in the semi-arid Great Plains, the residue that wheat stubble provides keeps erosion at bay, and the drought-hardy wheat plant remains a key rotational crop for growers there.

"We're wheat country," Horton said. "We're always going to plant some wheat."

But a global glut of wheat and improved genetics in crops like corn, which allows them to be farmed with less water, have shaken up crop rotations and crop budgets in the Great Plains region for years, Widmar noted.

"One thing we watch closely is these nationwide crop budgets, and it's clear that wheat has just been the hardest hit of the traditional commodities during this downturn," he said.

Horton is a passionate and dedicated wheat grower. His family routinely pushes wheat yields to impressive heights, and last year he won first place in the dryland winter wheat category of the National Wheat Yield Contest.

Yet even his operation trimmed its wheat acreage last year and is likely to do so again this year, he said.

"We're down a little bit more than last year, due to the fact that we planted corn back into some milo and corn stalks, where we normally would have been fallow going to wheat. So to bring wheat acres back up, we'd have to plant wheat into just-cut corn or go continuous wheat -- and right now the market is telling us not to do that," Horton said.

In times of slipping revenues and multiple years in the red, crop insurance coverage also becomes an important part of wheat planting decisions, Horton and Widmar noted.

USDA recently announced that U.S. farmers will receive $8 billion from 2016 crop insurance programs. Some of those payments are for disasters like hurricanes, wildfires and drought, but many were triggered by low commodity prices and shrinking farm revenues.

"If you just sit down and look at your APH [Actual Production History], lock in your insurance price on a row crop next year, and look at wheat strictly from an insurance perspective -- which I don't -- row crops [like corn and soybeans] have at least a $110-per-acre advantage over wheat," Horton estimated.



Wheat farmers will head into 2018 at the bottom of a three-decades-long slide in U.S. wheat acres.

"It's not unusual to see ups and downs in wheat acreage," Widmar said. "But what is unusual is this long, sustained downward trend. What makes it unique is we've been losing about 800,000 wheat acres a year, for about 35 years."

The slide became a cliff in the past two years, when U.S. farmers pulled wheat off nearly 9 million acres between 2015 and 2017. This year's planted wheat acreage of 46 million acres is the lowest in recorded U.S. history.

If Horton Seed Services' experience is any indicator, acres in 2018 will almost certainly be even lower, Horton said.

The company, which sells, treats and cleans certified wheat seed, covers much of western Kansas, Horton said. Wheat seed sales aren't final for the year yet, but their seed cleaning numbers have been telling, Horton said. Last year, they cleaned 9% fewer bushels of seed, and this year, they've cleaned 13% fewer bushels.

"There's no question wheat acres in western Kansas, at least, are going down again this year," he said.

Widmar concurred, but added that huge drops like those between 2015 and 2017 -- when wheat lost more than 4 million acres each year -- are unlikely.

"It's a little difficult to imagine another 4-plus-million-acre adjustment in wheat acres, especially to the downside," he said.

Why? The alternative crops of corn and soybeans simply aren't that attractive, in part because their acres have swelled as wheat has declined.

"If you're dumping nearly 9 million acres of wheat, those acres are going somewhere; farmers didn't idle them," Widmar said. "We pushed those and then some into corn and soybeans. So in some ways, we've been pushing some problems straight into another one."

To add to the over-production problem, 13 million acres have left the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) since 2007, most heavily from states like Montana, North Dakota, Texas and Kansas.

Currently, the CRP cap sits at 24 million acres, an all-time low in the program's 30-year history. As Congress takes on the 2018 farm bill, it will face important questions about whether to increase, maintain or lower that cap, Widmar pointed out.

"All those millions of acres have gone into production and these are areas that traditionally raise wheat," Widmar said. "So we're finding this struggle: We've increased production in the U.S. and globally when times are good; now how do we ratchet down?"


Source: Emily Unglesbee - DTN Staff Reporter

Photo: NAN


Leave a comment

Add comment


Recent Ag News

Zinke Supports Reintroduction of Grizzlies in Washington State: Livestock Groups Respond

3/23/2018 1:30:00 PM
WASHINGTON (March 23, 2018) - Today the Public Lands Council (PLC), National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA), and Washington Cattlemen’s Association (WCA) issued the following statements in response to the Department of the Interior’s announcement in support of introducing Grizzly Bears in the Washington North Cascades:  >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Montana Farmers and Ranchers Celebrate National Ag Week

3/22/2018 4:41:00 AM

National Ag Week recognizes and celebrates the abundance provided by agriculture. Every year, producers, agricultural associations, corporations, universities, government agencies and countless others across America join together to recognize the contributions of agriculture.

>> Read More
Article rating: No rating

ELD Delay and More: Omnibus Spending Bill

3/21/2018 9:06:00 PM
Electronic Logging Devices: The bill includes a provision that would grant livestock haulers an exemption from ELDs until September 30, 2018. >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

125 Years of Agriculture at Montana State University

3/21/2018 4:35:00 PM

The Montana State University College of Agriculture and Montana Agricultural Experiment Station are proud to salute the university's agricultural community and partners across the state.

>> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Wyoming Ranchers Win Right to Be Heard to Defend Against Grizzly Bears Predation

3/20/2018 9:39:00 AM
DENVER, CO. Today, a federal judge agreed that Wyoming ranchers add an important voice to the discussion over how to deal with the rebounded grizzly bear population around Yellowstone National Park. For decades, ranchers such as Charles C. Price and Mary E. Thoman have dealt with the deadly and dangerous effects of the growing grizzly bear population in their backyards but will finally be able to join with the court in ensuring all parties know the true effects of the grizzly bear. Mr. Price and Ms. Thoman, and their fellow ranchers lose countless numbers of livestock due to grizzly bear kills every year. Mr. Price and other ranchers in the Upper Green River Valley lost 71 cattle to confirmed grizzly bear kills in 2017 alone. Ms. Thoman and her family have not only lost countless sheep to grizzly bear kills, but also one of the family’s shepherds was mauled by a female grizzly bear in 2010. Those trying to make an honest living in rural western Wyoming are forced to expend a vast amount of money to try to protect themselves, their employees, and their livelihoods from the unrestrained predation by the ever-growing grizzly bear population. >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Find Articles by Date

«March 2018»