Northern Ag Network
Northern Ag Network
Northern Broadcasting System    Northern News Network    Northern Sports Network
Search This Site...
Search This Site...
What does and China mean for the future of Montana beef?

What does and China mean for the future of Montana beef?

12/7/2017 12:00:00 PM/Categories: Popular Posts, General News, Today's Top 5, Livestock, Cattle

by Dr. Eric Belasco, Associate Professor at Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics

The Montana Stockgrowers Association and Chinese e-commerce company,, recently agreed to a memorandum of understanding that included a $300 million agreement, which states that in addition to committing to import $200 million in Montana sourced beef, “JD with its partner intend to invest up to another $100 million to build a brand-new Slaughter House and Feedlot Infrastructures in Montana.”  Following are some initial thoughts on this deal, which are sure to evolve over the coming years.


1. Expanding beef export markets (especially in China) is critical.
The decision to reopen China’s market to U.S. beef was welcome news for ranchers all over the U.S..   However, selling into the Chinese market has been difficult to gain momentum with the competitiveness of meat supplies from other countries, especially Australia.  With the continued renegotiation of NAFTA and the commitment to leave TPP negotiations, the potential expansion of beef exports into China (the largest importer of beef in the world) will help to strengthen U.S. beef demand.  That being said, much of the beef that is raised under hormone-free and natural systems in Montana are particularly well-situated to take advantage of more open trade relations with China, given China’s ban on growth hormones.


2.  The value of a Montana brand remains unknown.
It is noteworthy that the deal with specifies that beef will be sourced from Montana.  Clearly, this deal could have been made with many other states, though the comparative advantage for Montana lies in its ability to create a natural beef product and utilize the ranch landscape in marketing its product.  Some examples of Montana branded beef products include Yellowstone Grassfed Beef, Wild Sky Beef, and La Cense Montana.  All of these brands are marketed as natural, hormone-free, and high quality beef products.  Schultz et al. (2012) states that “for a branded steak product to be successful, there must be a strong link between consumers’ attitudes and the attributes offered by the brand.”


3.  Meat processing in Montana comes with more complications.
While it is believed that would draw on existing beef supply systems to establish a linkage with Montana  beef products, there is a commitment to invest up to $100 million in slaughterhouse and feeding facilities.  A few years ago I contributed to a feasibility study for a multi-species meat processing facility in Montana (executive summary here).  The estimated cost of the plant was $65 million and included the processing of 250 cows and bison per day.  There is currently nothing near that scale in Montana, which has occurred for a few reasons.  First, it is difficult in Montana to source enough feed for animals in the feedlot cycle.  Most feedlots can be found in regions that are located nearby large corn production areas (see plot below).  While some feeding capacity already exists in Montana, a large meat processing plant would likely demand growth in that capacity and put pressure on the demand for feed sources.

Figure 1. Number of Cattle on Feed Sold, 2002

Second, the existing seasonal nature of cattle production in Montana makes it difficult to source enough animals for processing on a year-round basis.  Third, most beef processing is a small margin, large volume business.  There would need to be sufficient premiums in a Montana branded product in order to sustain a supply chain that operates at an increased cost, relative to larger operations found in Nebraska, Colorado, Texas, and Kansas.  


In summary, the opening of trade with China through the recent deal between and the MSGA is a step in the right direction that recognizes the importance of global markets in U.S. beef production.  While it’s still not clear to me how this deal will look in 5-10 years, those details are still being negotiated.  In the meantime, I look forward to seeing this deal evolve as it will likely push China to our list of top export markets in the coming years.


For more visit


Photo: NAN


Leave a comment

Add comment


Recent Ag News

FSA Offices to Reopen Temporarily

1/16/2019 12:50:00 PM
Certain FSA offices will temporarily reopen during normal business hours January 17, 18 and 22 with limited services. >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Ranchers Struggle with American Prairie Reserve Wildlife Conference

1/14/2019 3:12:00 PM
Ranchers live with wildlife every day, and so they are generally skeptical of any stranger’s free advice, especially when that “expert” is not from their part of the world. >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Poll: Consumers Want FDA to End Mislabeling of Fake Milks

1/14/2019 2:57:00 PM
New national survey data released Jan. 10 found that consumers – by a nearly three-to-one margin – want the U.S. Food & Drug Administration to enforce existing regulations and prohibit non-dairy beverage companies from using the term “milk” on their product labels. FDA is currently soliciting public comment regarding front-of-package dairy labeling regulations through Jan. 28. >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Opinion: Wildlife Conference is an APR Sideshow

1/14/2019 2:54:00 PM
The American Prairie Reserve is presently engaged in a major publicity effort to advance its acceptance in the Lewistown area by supporting a conference to teach area landowners how to live with wildlife. >> Read More
Article rating: 2.3

New Grain Marketing Tool Available Using Historical Montana Wheat Basis

1/14/2019 10:29:00 AM

We always hear about the basis but how can you use it to make marketing decisions?

>> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Find Articles by Date

«January 2019»