Grazing immediately following a wildfire has long been thought to be damaging to grasslands, and delaying grazing is often recommended. This recommendation may be needlessly causing livestock producers extra work and loss of income.
Now there is some good news for ranchers in the west affected by wildfires. They might not have to wait 2 to 3 years after a fire to graze their cattle on federal rangelands.
Lance Vermeire, an Agricultural Research Service (ARS) ecologist in Miles City, Montana, found grazing within a year after a wildfire doesn’t harm grass and can provide just as much forage as sites that haven’t burned. At stake is access to the mixed prairie grasses covering federal rangelands in western states.
About 4 million acres of U.S. rangelands burn every year. Not all of that acreage is suitable for grazing, but millions of suitable acres do burn in wildfires in any given year.
In the past, the Bureau of Land Management and the USDA Forest Service both generally recommended up to 3 years of rest from grazing after a fire, based on a theory that the grasses native to the dry climate of the northern prairies need that much time to recover. However, both agencies are shifting away from that position—in large part because of findings by Vermeire and his colleagues.
Vermeire has found in a series of studies that native grasses usually survive wildfires. When a fire sweeps through, it takes the dead plant material from the surface, but grass grows back quickly because most of the plant is below ground and escapes long-term damage. The key to grass growth is the amount of rainfall, not whether there’s been a wildfire, he says. Moreover, a fire can actually improve the quality of the forage by increasing growth of grass types with more protein, his studies show.
In a recent study, Vermeire and his colleagues evaluated the productivity of northern prairie grasses grazed at a site in South Dakota where a wildfire burned 10,680 acres the year before. They compared the productivity of grazed tracts to nongrazed tracts and found no significant differences in grass growth. The cattle also removed 47 percent of the vegetation from the burned sites – which is an average rate of removal.
The study was partially funded by the USDA Forest Service, and the results will help guide federal policies on rangeland management—and could bring some relief to some beef producers who depend on rangelands for forage.
For more information on the impact of fire on rangelands and grazing please visit the Fire Science Exchange or Rangeland is Resilient to Fire.
Source & Photo: USDA ARS
