John Munsell Weighs in on New Traceback Policy

by

The following is portion of an article from Food Safety News:

by Helena Bottemiller

If you follow food safety policy, there’s a good chance that when you think of traceback, you think of John Munsell. Once dubbed the “meatpacking maverick,” Munsell has been extremely critical of the fact that the U.S. Department of Agriculture doesn’t routinely track the source of E. coli O157:H7 beef contamination unless people are sick.

In 2002, the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service — the billion dollar agency responsible for the safety of America’s meat and poultry — found E. coli O157:H7 in Munsell’s small Montana meat grinding operation. He recalled 207 pounds of ground beef and both Munsell and his USDA inspector notified the agency that the contaminated beef had been sourced from ConAgra’s massive slaughter plant in Greeley, CO.

Instead of looking up the supply chain to pinpoint where the contamination might have occurred, USDA officials shut down Munsell’s business for four months.  A few months later, 45 illnesses in 23 states were linked to E. coli contamination at the Greeley plant. By the time ConAgra recalled 19.1 million pounds of beef, more than 80 percent of it had already been consumed by consumers.

Munsell was incensed. He thought the USDA’s actions were not only unfair, they were not in the interest of public health.

“I came to realize real quickly how disingenuous they were,” Munsell told Food Safety News in an interview. “And I realized that if they could pull this off at my plant, obviously they could do it at all small plants across America. Secondly, I came to realize–I had two young grandkids at that time–that the USDA could really care less about the health of my grandkids. When I came to those conclusions, I decided to fight them every inch of the way and to expose problems within the USDA’s meat inspection program.”

A few years after the ConAgra recall, Munsell became fed up with regulatory red tape, sold his business, and founded the Foundation for Accountability in Regulatory Enforcement (FARE) to “protect the rights of legitimate small plant owners in their dealings with USDA” and to advocate better policy. He has been omnipresent in the conversation about meat safety — commenting on blogs and FSIS policies, writing op-eds, and questioning food safety officials whenever possible.

Last week, more than ten years after Munsell’s run in with the agency, FSIS announced that in July it will begin tracing meat contaminated with E. coli back to the source whether or not there are illnesses tied to the product and the agency will start the traceback investigation before test results are even confirmed.

The agency said it would “move quickly to identify the supplier of the product” and then, if a sample is confirmed positive, notify other processors who may have received contaminated meat from the same supplier, which will help keep contaminated meat from consumer’s shopping carts.

On the whole, Munsell is pleased with the move, but cautions that time will tell whether the agency is actually able to roll out the new policy and make it the norm.

CLICK HERE to read the remainder of this article.

 

Source:  Food Safety News

Posted by Haylie Shipp

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x